yogi_bear_79
10-22-2007, 11:58 AM
I figure this is a no-brainer, but I still seek input.
I am parseing large text files, and each time the array is written the code checks for the next available row. It would seem to be more efficent to check for the next available row at the top of the routine, store it in an integer and increment the integer as the code loops. In one example the loop could run 1000 times, seems the end result would be faster to check one & increment?
I am parseing large text files, and each time the array is written the code checks for the next available row. It would seem to be more efficent to check for the next available row at the top of the routine, store it in an integer and increment the integer as the code loops. In one example the loop could run 1000 times, seems the end result would be faster to check one & increment?