no rant apology necessary. It is the reverse of caveat emptor. I would embed "extra features" in code and just not remove them until they paid up anyway.Originally Posted by stanl
no rant apology necessary. It is the reverse of caveat emptor. I would embed "extra features" in code and just not remove them until they paid up anyway.Originally Posted by stanl
If you have posted the same question at multiple forums, please read this IMPORTANT INFO.
Please use the thread tools to mark your thread Solved
Please review the Knowledge Base
for samples and solutions , or to submit your own!![]()