I've managed to lose about 15 of the CFs by having the first CF colouring red any row that contains 100 in column Z and stopping if TRUE, then deleting all the others which referred to 100 in column Z.
In the attached I have constructed a table of all combinations: Capture3.JPGwhere:
there's a letter r/a/g if you've got an explicit CF for a particular combination,
filled with the colour that actually shows with your CFs (with one exception),
a question mark just wondering if that combination should be green?
The exception is where I've put r shows a which means you may have a CF intended to show red there but it in fact shows amber.
The first thing I noticed is that the first 2 colmns were all red regardless of what was in column J.(Implemented)
Where there are similar r/a/g patterns in rows, theoretically you should be able to combine them (Not implemented):
ServiceRequest-1.1,ServiceRequest-1.2,ServiceRequest-2.1
ServiceRequest-3.1,ServiceRequest-3.2, and possibly also with ServiceRequest-3.3.
To help test I added rows to Raw Data from row 296 down of all combinations in the table, with the original colour in words in column I.
In VBA there's a new Module 4 which is a copy of your Module 1 with the very last CF in the module adjusted for the 100s and commented out some 15, now unnecessary, CFs.
p45cal Everyone: If I've helped and you can't be bothered to acknowledge it, I can't be bothered to look at further posts from you.