I'm not sure I see the difference in the new workbook (6.1.1) other than you've injected several blank rows into the data Table. From a design perspective, input data is generally segregated from output/display data, which is your calendar in this case. having the input data adjacent to the output can have issues. One of which you've identified, if the user wants to see more data they have to scroll down. Partly this is because the Table is housing all data and not just the data for the currently viewed month.

My recommendation for this would be to house the input Table on a different worksheet. If you want to show the data in a Table format for the selected month, you can do that with a secondary Table. This would probably be the approach I would take if I were doing this.

As a side note, the Table in this new version has headers which are blank. It appears your header row is one row above the Table in a standard range. This makes it look like a blank row in the Table. Also, your formulas aren't using structured references, which I would recommend using. It makes working with formulas a bit easier.

I can setup a data input sheet, like I described above, although I don't want to do some work if you don't want it (waste of both our time). Is that something you're interested in?